Which do YOU like better? I’ve been going back to some of my older photos and trying this blowing-out-the-highlights thing. It’s a little different, and I’m still not completely sure what I think about it. So today I’m going to post two photos—from the same place, same time, and slightly different compositions.
Here’s the new one that I’m still getting used to:
Here’s the old one—this is the way things are usually done for landscape photography. I actually put my camera on my tripod, fully extended the tripod, and held it up as high as I could to get some perspective in this shot.
What do you think?
Tags: arts, blowing out the highlights, blown out highlights, camera, compositions, creative, experimentation, highlight, highlight experimentation, landscape, landscape photography, landscapes, nature and wildlife, overexpose, overexposure, perspective, photographers, photography, photos, place, tripod, visual arts, whitepoint
So, the traditional landscape one leaves me a bit cold—nice enough, but not exciting. I don’t know if that’s because of the highlights in the top one or because you can see so much more of the cracked-mud detail. It would be handy to see a print. The blown-out part makes for more interesting composition—actually, it makes me think of an unfinished painting.
Hmm. I’ll be interested in what other people have to say too!
I agree with Anna in that the traditional exposure does seem a bit dull by comparison. That being said, I’m not all that crazy about the blown-out highlights in the other photo either.
To be blunt: if these photos do not work, it is not because you did or did not over-expose the highlights; I’m afraid this is not your best composition ever.
I want to see you try it with this photo.
Yeah, I think you’re right. It was one of those going through old photos and thinking “ooooh, what if I do this?” moments, and not so much a “this is an awesome photo” moment. I think success may depend on intentionally taking photos for this purpose, rather than finding old photos that may or may not work.